Experienced in Education, Civil, and Disability Rights

A litigation firm with a unique blend of experience in special education law, education law, employment law and civil rights law. The firm also provides small businesses representation ranging from transactional issues such as contracts and contract development to litigation representation.

Experienced in special education law, education law, employment law and civil rights law

After contacting our office, if based on the information you have provided, we believe that representation is appropriate, we offer a 30-minute consultation to determine if retaining our service is needed. Our rates are competitive and in line with prevailing rates in the community. Also, we sometimes work on a sliding fee scale basis, and in some cases, we offer a reduced rate for attorneys’ fees. Our hourly rates are competitive and reasonable. Get in touch as soon as possible to learn how we can help you.


To share your information and to allow us to determine whether a initial consultation with one of our attorneys is appropriate- complete the information here: email the firm or call 844-276-9798.

More About Us
Happy Attorney Clients

Our Practice Areas

Education Law

Representing parents and students for expulsion, suspension, special education rights, and higher education matters.

Discover More

Business Law

Offering counsel for new and established businesses, as well as experienced business and commercial litigation representation.

Discover More

Disability Rights

Advocating for people with disabilities under the Americans with Disabilities Act, Section 504 and disability laws.

Discover More

Employment Law

Serving employees throughout California facing wrongful termination, retaliation and other issues.

Discover More

Civil Rights Litigation

Passionate civil rights lawyers protecting people in a wide range of administrative, state and federal areas.

Discover More

Our Dedicated Legal Team

Our team at Leigh Law Group is highly experienced in the legal services we offer. Our clients success is our success. We work through the process together to work toward the best possible outcome.

Past results do not guarantee future outcomes*

What's Happening?

May 4, 2026
California parents frustrated by vague grading — a C+ with no rubric, no written criteria, and no clear explanation — often assume there's nothing to be done. Education Code § 49066 does give teachers broad discretion over grade determinations, and a grade is generally final absent clerical mistake, fraud, bad faith, or incompetency. But that's not the end of the analysis. A grade is also a pupil record, and under Education Code § 49070, parents have a statutory right to challenge the content of any pupil record on six specific grounds, including that the record is "an unsubstantiated personal conclusion or inference," "misleading," or "inaccurate." A grade awarded without a communicated rubric or defined criteria fits squarely within those grounds. The § 49070 process is a real procedural vehicle, not a suggestion. Parents file a written challenge with the superintendent, who must meet with the parent and the teacher within 30 days and issue a decision. If denied, the parent has 30 days to appeal to the governing board, which holds a closed session and issues a final decision — reviewable by writ if the parent preserves the record. While the board cannot override the teacher's grade determination without giving the teacher an opportunity to be heard, it can and does order corrections when a grade lacks a substantiated basis. For families stuck in a loop of vague feedback and unexplained marks, § 49070 reframes the dispute: the question isn't whether the child deserves a better grade, but whether the record itself is supportable under the statute. At Leigh Law Group, we help California families navigate these challenges strategically — preserving rights, creating a clean administrative record, and holding districts to the procedures the Education Code requires.
February 26, 2025
Starting from the 2025–2026 school year, Education Code Section 53008 mandates that all local educational agencies (LEAs) must evaluate students in kindergarten through second grade for potential reading challenges using approved screeners. These screeners aim to support students facing reading difficulties and do not substitute the requirements of federal or state laws for timely child find assessments to determine eligibility for special education under state or federal regulations. Students with existing eligibility under section 504 or an Individualized Education Program (IEP) have the choice to opt out of the screening assessments. Parents can also opt out if their child is undergoing evaluation for special education or a 504 plan. Our team has worked hard to advocate for families who need reading interventions and have been denied access to support and services. For more details, refer to the complete statute here: EDC 53008 #Education #ReadingDifficulties #StudentAssessment
February 24, 2025
Is your charter school or is the school district responsible for a denial of FAPE? The answer it depends on the MOU contract and also whether the charter is a school considered part of the school district or its own designated LEA. Why does this matter- don't be the family who went to due process and lost when they failed to name the correct agency! From the case: Students with disabilities and their families retain all rights under the IDEA when a student is attending a charter school, just as they would when attending traditional public schools. (34 C.F.R. § 300.209(a).) This also applies to online and virtual charter schools. (See Dear Colleague Letter, 68 IDELR 108 (OSERS/OSEP 2016.) Charter schools may not deny any student admission based upon a student's disability. (34 C.F.R. § 104.4(b)(1)(i); Ed. Code, § 47605.) All California charter schools are public schools; however, some are also designated local educational agencies, referred to as LEAs. (34 C.F.R § 300.7; 71 Fed. Reg. 46,548 (2006); Ed. Code, § 47641.) An LEA means a school district, a county office of education, a nonprofit charter school participating as a member of a special education local plan area, referred to as a SELPA, or a SELPA. (Ed. Code, § 56026.3.) Not all charter schools are LEAs. (Ed. Code, § 47641.) Rather, the law allows charter schools and their chartering agency to choose between two options: (1) the charter school may be a school within the chartering LEA for the purpose of special education; or (2) the charter school may become its own LEA and join a SELPA, receive special education funds, and take responsibility for providing students special education and related services. (Id.; Ed. Code, § 47641.) This is a critical distinction in disputes under the IDEA, as LEAs bear the responsibility for providing students a FAPE and the consequent liability for any failure to provide a FAPE in a due process hearing. When a charter school is designated a school of the LEA, the LEA is responsible for ensuring that attending students with disabilities receive a FAPE as required by the IDEA and California law. (Ed. Code, § 47641, subd. (a).) However, LEAs and charter schools are not precluded from entering into Memorandums of Understanding, referred to as MOUs, that grant charter schools more autonomy, responsibility, and funding to provide special education and related services. (“Enrollment of Students with Disabilities in Charter Schools,” California Department of Education Official Letter, December 27, 2017.)

PCDH19 Alliance 2016 Conference - Mandy Leigh

Protecting Your Rights

Work with a dedicated legal team today! Fill out the form below to get started.

Free Consultation

Please Review: Thank you so much for contacting our law office! Please read the privacy policy below, and then fill out this form in its entirety. It takes us about 48 hours to review the form. After review, our office will determine if more information is needed and whether setting up a 20 minute consult is appropriate to discuss possible representation. Completing this form does not mean that you are a client or will be a client but it does help us understand your matter. If we don't respond, please note, this is not a reflection on the merits of your case and you can follow up or continue to seek representation elsewhere.